Active learning or traditional teaching at the upper secondary level: An exploratory review of teacher and student perceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22519/22157379.2666Keywords:
Active learning; Traditional teaching; Upper secondary education; Educational barriers; Scoping review.Abstract
The transition to active learning in upper secondary education represents a profound structural and epistemological challenge. This article develops a scoping review, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, aimed at analyzing the tensions, barriers, and perceptions of teachers and students regarding the dichotomy between traditional teaching and active methodologies. Through a systematic search in the Scopus database, 280 records were screened, establishing a final corpus of 20 high-impact qualitative and mixed-methods empirical studies. The analysis reveals three critical findings: 1) the persistence of a severe curricular tension, where the rigidity of syllabi and the pressure to meet standardized metrics inhibit methodological innovation; 2) marked teacher resistance at higher educational levels, anchored in directive pedagogical beliefs and exacerbated by administrative overload; and 3) a methodological shock among students, who face an initial deficit in self-regulation skills, but who, upon adaptation, significantly value the acquired autonomy and dynamism. It is concluded that the success of this transition goes beyond instructional change; it demands institutional restructuring that provides continuous scaffolding for teachers and socio-emotional support for students.
References
ABU KHURMA, Othman y Fadi El Zein (2024), «"Inquiry skills teaching and its relationship with UAE secondary school students' critical thinking: Systematic review of science teachers' perspectives"», Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 20, núm. 2, pp. em2397.
ALBAR, Muhammad Kholil (2023), «"What is the Study Policy in Banyumas? Implementation of Active Learning Strategies in Junior High School"», SDG Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, vol. 11, núm. 3, pp. 1-18.
BALUKOVIC, Jasmina, Josip Sliško y Daniel Doz (2025), «"Conceptual understanding of gravity: comparison of effects of active learning and traditional learning"», Research in Science & Technological Education. [En prensa].
CÓRDOVA-ESPARZA, Diana-Margarita, Juan Antonio Romero-González, Karen-Elizabeth Córdova-Esparza, Juan Terven y René Edmundo López-Martínez (2024), «"Active learning strategies in computer science education: A systematic review"», Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, vol. 8, núm. 6, p. 50.
ED-DALI, Rachid (2025), «"Adopting the flipped classroom model in EFL classrooms: transforming active learning for Moroccan high school students"», Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, vol. 10, núm. 58.
ESTÉVEZ-MÉNDEZ, José Luis, Juan Luis Díaz Palencia, Alejandro Sánchez Sánchez y Juan Roa González (2024), «"Evaluación de variables contextuales en la implementación de la metodología Flipped Classroom en educación secundaria"», RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, vol. 27, núm. 2, pp. 317-337.
FILIPE, V., Y. Blanco-García, F. Perales y J. Aróstegui (2024), «"Toward a transversal education model: a review of digital and artistic-musical competencies (2014–2024)"», Arts Education Policy Review, pp. 1-15. [En prensa].
FORNONS, Verónica, Ramon Palau y Raúl Santiago (2021), «"Secondary school students' perception according to their learning style of a mathematics Flipped Classroom"», Journal of Technology and Science Education, vol. 11, núm. 2, pp. 227-244.
FUKUDA, Misato, Takuya Fukaya y Takashi Kusumi (2024), «"Differences and Relationships Between Teachers' Pedagogical Beliefs and Teaching Strategies Used at Different School Levels in Japan"», SAGE Open, vol. 14, núm. 3, pp. 1-14.
GARCÍA-PEÑALVO, Francisco José, Héctor Alarcón y Alfonso Dominguez (2019), «"Active learning experiences in engineering education"», International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, núm. 1, pp. 1-5.
GEORGE-REYES, Carlos Enrique, Tania Tapia-Bastidas, Luis Felipe Sandoval-Benitez, Roberto Caicedo-Quiroz y Alba Ruth Pinto-Santos (2025), «"Rethinking maker education: Makerspaces, gender, and STEM skills in the era of inclusive educational intelligence"», Frontiers in Education, vol. 10. [En prensa].
GONZÁLEZ-PÉREZ, Laura I. y María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya (2022), «"Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: Systematic review"», Sustainability, vol. 14, núm. 3, p. 1493.
GONZÁLEZ-PÉREZ, Manuel, Alberto Grao-Cruces, Francisco Javier Bandera-Campos, Anna Chalkley, David Camiletti-Moirón y Diego Sánchez-Oliva (2025), «"Less is more: Qualitative insights into physically active learning in secondary math education"», PLOS One, vol. 20, núm. 11, p. e0336641.
HOLLANDER, Lucy E., Zoi Toumpakari y Lydia Emm-Collison (2025), «"Teacher acceptability of physically active learning in UK secondary schools - a mixed methods study"», PLOS One, vol. 20, núm. 8, p. e0328376.
LUCERO BALDEVENITES, Eliana Vanessa, Víctor Hugo González Torres, Yarid Díaz-Romero y María Mercedes Bueno-Fernández (2024), «"Didactic innovation in the teaching of experimental sciences based on a competency-based approach: A review in the field of health sciences"», Health Leadership and Quality of Life. [En prensa].
LYTRAS, Miltiadis D., Wadee Alhalabi, María José Terrón Ruiz, Paraskevi Papadopoulou y Christina Marouli (2022), «"Emerging technologies for engineering education: Flexibility, consistent exploration, realism, integration, and sustainable development for active learning"», International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32, núm. 4.
MAJDI, Zeinab, Mesbah Khalili Sabet y Alireza Mahdavi-Zafarghandi (2025), «"Exploring the effect of using active learning strategies on Iranian intermediate female EFL learners reading comprehension: a mixed methods study"», Frontiers in Education, vol. 10, p. 1539722.
MARTÍNEZ-PELÁEZ, Rafael, Leopoldo J. Mena, Horacio Toral-Cruz, Alejandro Ochoa-Brust, Alberto G. Potes, Vicent Flores, Raúl Ostos, Juan C. R. Pacheco, Ricardo A. Félix y Víctor G. Félix (2025), «"Can large language models foster critical thinking, teamwork, and problem-solving skills in higher education?: A literature review"», AI and Ethics, pp. 1-18.
MERCADO-VARELA, Marco Antonio, Armando Lozano-Rodríguez, José Manuel Ochoa-Alcántar y Rocío Isabel Pizá-Gutiérrez (2025), «"Active teaching strategies in higher education: A systematic literature review"», International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, vol. 32, núm. 2, pp. 137-160.
Miranda Medina, C. F., Segoviano Hernández, J., & Rodríguez Burgos, K. E. (2025). Procesos educativos en el contexto latinoamericano.
OLANA, Tesfaye, Kebede Bacha y Abera Lemma (2026), «"Secondary school students' perceptions of the flipped classroom approach in biology learning"», Discover Education, vol. 5, núm. 270.
OTHMAN, Othman, Zul Hafiz Iksan y Ruhizan Mohammad Yasin (2022), «"Creative Teaching STEM Module: High School Students' Perception"», European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 11, núm. 4, pp. 2127-2137.
PALAU, Ramon y Raúl Santiago (2022), «"Flipped Learning y su distribución de los tiempos de aprendizaje: Una experiencia en educación secundaria"», Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, vol. 64, pp. 1-20.
PATIÑO, Azeneth, María Soledad Ramírez-Montoya y Gerardo Ibarra-Vazquez (2023), «"Trends and research outcomes of technology-based interventions for complex thinking development in higher education: A review of scientific publications"», Contemporary Educational Technology, vol. 15, núm. 4, p. ep447.
PELED, Yehuda, Ina Blau y Rivka Grinberg (2022), «"Crosschecking teachers' perspectives on learning in a one-to-one environment with their actual classroom behavior - a longitudinal study"», Education and Information Technologies, vol. 27, pp. 4841-4864.
PEREZ-GARCIA, Iris Noemí, Elena Andrade-Gómez, Mercedes Arias-Colinas y María Isabel Pardavila-Belio (2025), «"Exploring nutritional education in undergraduate nursing students: A scoping review"», Journal of Nursing Education. [En prensa].
RAMÍREZ-MONTOYA, María Soledad, I. M. Castillo-Martínez, J. C. Sanabria-Zepeda y J. Miranda (2022), «"Complex Thinking in the Framework of Education 4.0 and Open Innovation—A Systematic Literature Review"», Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, núm. 1.
REINOSO TAPIA, Ricardo, Miguel Ángel Collazos Martínez, María del Carmen Martínez Martínez y Jacinto Delgado Iglesias (2021), «"Flipped classroom for teaching digestive system to high school students: Performance, perception and inquiry competence level"», Journal of Technology and Science Education, vol. 11, núm. 1, pp. 194-209.
Rodríguez, N. G., Cantúd, L. M. M., Bulnes, M. G. R., & Moreno, I. E. (2021). Identidad Profesional Docente: Alternativas Metodológicas para la Investigación Cualitativa. Revista Lengua y Cultura, 3(5), 108-117.
TRICCO, Andrea C., Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly K. O'Brien, Heather Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, David Moher, Maritsa D. Peters, Sharon E. Straus et al. (2018), «"PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation"», Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, núm. 7, pp. 467-473.
VERRELST, Jochem, Miriam Morata, José Luis García-Soria, Yujie Sun, Junchuan Qi y Juan Pablo Rivera-Caicedo (2025), «"RTM surrogate modeling in optical remote sensing: A review of emulation for vegetation and atmosphere applications"», Remote Sensing, vol. 17, núm. 21, p. 3618.
VILLASEÑOR-OVIES, Pablo, José Eduardo Navarro-Zarza y Juan J. Canoso (2020), «"The rheumatology physical examination: Making clinical anatomy relevant"», Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 39, núm. 3, pp. 651-657.
WILSON, Kendra (2020), «"Exploring the Challenges and Enablers of Implementing a STEM Project-Based Learning Programme in a Diverse Junior Secondary Context"», International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. [En prensa].
YUNZAL JR., Alfredo N., Angelo G. Rallos, Michael N. Nanud, Melchor L. Ondoy, Jeruel M. Ares y Marivic Picardal (2024), «"Exploring Active Learning Strategies in Science among Senior High School STEM Learners and Teachers"», Science Education International, vol. 35, núm. 4, pp. 369-381.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional.