University entrepreneurship from the development of monographic projects
Keywords:
University entrepreneurship, Strategies, Monographic projects.Abstract
University entrepreneurship is a challenge due to various factors that can negatively affect the consolidation of entrepreneurial ideas. Monographic projects could be a tool for its promotion, but students sometimes have unfavorable attitudes towards it and do not recognize the value and professional opportunities of their projects. Moreover, the methodology and didactics used by educators do not allow monographs to be perceived as potential undertakings. Therefore, this research aims to strengthen the development of monographic projects as a strategy to promote university entrepreneurship in the programmes of Tourism and Hotel Management, Industrial Management, and Industrial Design, Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia Facultad Seccional Duitama. The research assumes a qualitative approach with descriptive scope and action research design. Thirty students from the academic programmes in question, both graduates and active students, were analyzed. Strategies were formulated to promote university entrepreneurship and overcome the obstacles that limit the development of monographic projects, based on which it is concluded that there is a need to promote a positive attitude among students towards their projects, and that teachers re-evaluate their methods and approaches to support entrepreneurship.
References
Ástebro Audretsch,, T., Bazzazian, N., y Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41(4), 663–677. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.004
Audretsch, D., B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer.1–9. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1
Bercovitz, J. y Feldman, M. (2008) Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0295.
Borrayo Rodríguez, C.L., Valdez Zepeda, A., y Delgado Melgarejo, B. (2018). Cultura emprendedora en jóvenes universitarios de Guadalajara, México. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Ve), vol. XXV, núm. 3, 72-87, 2019.Universidad del Zulia. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/280/28060161005/html/
Danhke, G. 1. (1989). Investigación y comunicación. En C. Fernández-Collado y G. L. Danhke
(Eds.). La comunicación humana: Ciencia social (pp. 385-454). México: McGraw-Hill.
Dolabela, F. (2003). Pedagogía emprendedora. Ed. Cultura. São Paulo.
Duval, C. (2013). Assessing the Impact of Entrepreneurship Education Programs: Challenges and Approaches. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3),394-409.
Ferrance, E. (2000). Action Research. Providence: Northeast and Islands Regiona Educational Laboratory at Brown University.https://www.scirp.org/(S(i43dyn45teexjx455qlt3d2q))/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=2439462
García, J. (2019). El potencial emprendedor de los proyectos de investigación en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Investigación Académica, 25(3), 67-82.
Geissler, M. (2013). Determinanten des Vorgründungsprozesses. Wiesbaden: Springer
Fachmedien Wiesbaden. doi:10.1007/978-3-658-01665-4.
Herrera Fuentes, J.L. (2006). The bond university-enterprise in the formation of the university professionals. Revista Electrónica “Actualidades Investigativas en Educación”. Volumen 6, Número 2, Año 2006, ISSN 1409-
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26447887_El_vinculo_universidad-
empresa_en_la_formacion_de_los_profesionales_universitarios/fulltext/0e605473f0c46d4f0ab08d22/El-vinculo-universidad-empresa-en-la-formacion-de-los-profesionales-universitarios.pdf?_sg%5B0%5D=started_experiment_milestone
Iglesias, S., Jambrino, M., Peñafiel, V., y Husam, K. (2016). Impact of entrepreneurship programmes on university students, Education Training, 58(2), 209-228.
Lans, T., Hulsink, W., Baert, H. y Mulder, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship education and training in a small business context: insights from the competence-based approach. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 16(4), 363-383
Lena, L.; y Wong, P.K. (2005). Entrepreneurship Education – A Compendium of Related Issues. Nus Entrepreneurship Centre. National University of Singapore.
Lucca Irizarry, N. y Berríos Rivera, R. (2009). Investigación cualitativa. Fundamentos, diseños y estrategias. Ediciones SM.
Maldonado, M. (2006). Competencias Método y Genealogía. Colombia: ECOEEdiciones.
Maldonado, C. C. E. (2009) Complejidad: revolución científica y teoría. Colección Complejidad. Facultad de Administración. Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
Martínez, J. (2011) Métodos de investigación cualitativa. Research Journal Silogismo, [S.l.],1, No. 08. http://www.cide.edu.co/ojs/index.php/silogismo/article/view/64/53
Mora, R. (2011). Estudio de actitudes emprendedoras con profesionales que crearon empresa.
Revista Escuela de Administración de Negocios, (71), 70-83. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=20623157006
Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos. OCDE. (2004). Innovation in the Knowledge Economy. Implications for Education and Learning. Paris: OCDE.
Osorio. F. F., Gálvez A, E J, y Murillo V, G (2010). La estrategia y el emprendedor: diversas perspectivas para el análisis. Universidad del Valle. Cuadernos de Administración. Facultad de Ciencias de la Administración. (43), 65-79.
Padilla, M., Loor, S., y Guamanquispe, V. (2019). Análisis del Emprendimiento Universitario
desde la Perspectiva de la Universidad Pública, Caso Facultad de Ciencias Administrativas. Ciencia Digital, 9(2), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v9i2.374
Terán, R. A C y León. G. G. (2010). Visión del emprendimiento desde el Estado y la universidad: el plan de desarrollo de Antioquia visión 2020 con el programa de emprendimiento de la UPB. Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Revista Ciencias Estratégicas. 18 (23) 119-129.
Tobón, S. (2006). Formación Basada en Competencias. Pensamiento complejo, diseño curricular y didáctica. Colombia: ECOE Ediciones.
Vainrub, R. (2007). Convertir sueños en realidades. Una guía para emprendedores. Caracas: Ediciones IESA
Wasserman, N. (2012). The founder´s dilemmas. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J. y Wright, M. (2011) The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8),1128-1143.
Westlund, H. (2010). Multidimensional entrepreneurship: Theoretical considerations and Swedish empirics. 50th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Sustainable Regional Growth and Development in the Creative Knowledge Economy", (pp. 19-23). Jönköping, Sweden.
Zabalza, M. (2003). Competencias docentes del profesorado universitario. España: Nancea, S.A. de Ediciones.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-05-09 (4)
- 2024-05-08 (3)
- 2024-05-08 (2)
- 2021-12-16 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors give their rights to the article in a non-exclusive way for the magazine to be published for the first time by the journal as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, to an institutional repository or to publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or your own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as a citation more early and most of published work (See the Effect of Open Access) (in English).
