Challenges in the management of reseach projects with funding from Minciencias: case study Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Authors

  • Danilo Alberto Vera Parra Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
  • Flor Marlén Avila Guerrero Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
  • Roberto Ferro Escobar Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Keywords:

difficulties in project management, Minciencias, management variables

Abstract

In project management, it is essential to integrate various variables for efficient execution. However, some managers often do not consider all the inherent variables at different stages of the project, which negatively impacts timely completion and delivery, and leads to cost overruns. From this perspective, the present research aimed to identify the factors affecting the development of research projects funded by Minciencias at the Francisco José de Caldas District University. The guidelines of qualitative research were followed, with a descriptive scope and a case study design. The different entities of the university were considered primary sources for identifying the variables that affect the effective execution of research projects. Findings from surveys, interviews, focus groups, and document analysis revealed that time, cost, and scope variables are the most impactful on project execution. It was concluded that it is crucial to consider these variables in project management, as inadequate management can lead to delays, cost overruns, and reduced effectiveness. Therefore, it is necessary to develop comprehensive strategies, continuous training, and monitoring and control mechanisms for more efficient execution and achievement of the proposed objectives.

References

Ahsan, K., & Gunawan, I. (2010). Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 28, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPROMAN.2009.03.005.

Ajmal, M., Khan, M., & Al-Yafei, H. (2019). Exploring factors behind project scope creep – stakeholders’ perspective. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 13, 483-504. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-10-2018-0228.

Bianco, L., Caramia, M., & Giordani, S. (2016). Resource levelling in project scheduling with generalized precedence relationships and variable execution intensities. OR Spectrum, 38, 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-016-0435-1

Binder, C., Absenger-Helmli, I., & Schilling, T. (2015). The reality of transdisciplinarity: a framework-based self-reflection from science and practice leaders. Sustainability Science, 10, 545 - 562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0328-2.

Chase, J., Topp, R., Smith, C., Cohen, M., Fahrenwald, N., Zerwic, J., Benefield, L., Anderson, C., & Conn, V. (2013). Time Management Strategies for Research Productivity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 35, 155 - 176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945912451163.

Coccia, M. (2019). Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? Technology in Society, 59(noviembre 2019), 101124. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TECHSOC.2019.03.007

Dáher Nader, J. E., Panunzio, A. P., & Hernández Navarro, M. I. (2018). La investigación científica: una función universitaria a considerar en el contexto ecuatoriano. EDUMECENTRO, 10(4), 166-179. Recuperado, de http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2077-28742018000400011&lng=es&tlng=es

Ebneyamini, S. y Moghadam, M. (2018). Hacia el desarrollo de un marco para realizar investigaciones de estudios de casos. Revista Internacional de Métodos Cualitativos, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918817954 .

Flyvbjerg, B. (2018). Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge University Press.

Ghorbani, S. y Khanachah, SN (2020). Investigar los motivos de fracasos y retrasos en proyectos de I+D con el enfoque de gestión de proyectos. Anales de investigación en gestión y organización , 1 (4), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v1i4.553

Grimes, D. y Schulz, K. (2002). Estudios descriptivos: qué pueden y qué no pueden hacer. The Lancet , 359, 145-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07373-7 .

Highsmith, J. (2019). Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.

Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-298. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.005

Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management metrics, KPIs, and dashboards: A guide to measuring and monitoring project performance (11th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (12th ed.). Wiley.

Knickel, M., Knickel, K., Galli, F., Maye, D., & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2019). Hacia un marco reflexivo para fomentar el coaprendizaje y la mejora de la colaboración transdisciplinaria. Sostenibilidad, 11(23), 6602. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236602

Koi-Akrofi, G., Afful, E., & Matey, H. (2019). I.T. Project Success: Practical Frameworks based on key Project Control Variables. ArXiv, abs/1910.06215. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijsea.2019.10504.

Kumar, S. y Thakkar, JJ (2017), "Análisis de programación y sobrecostos para proyectos de I+D utilizando ANP y dinámica de sistemas", Revista internacional de gestión de calidad y confiabilidad, vol. 34 N° 9, págs. 1551-1567. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-04-2016-0050

Kuchta, D., & Zabor, A. (2020). Modelado de incertidumbre difusa en la previsión de costos y flujo de efectivo en proyectos. En C. Kahraman, S. Cevik Onar, B. Oztaysi, I. Sari, S. Cebi, & A. Tolga (Eds.), Técnicas inteligentes y difusas: Soluciones inteligentes e innovadoras (Vol. 1197, pp. 1206-1215). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_141

Larson, E. W., & Gray, C. F. (2014). Project management: The managerial process (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Leslie, D. (2005). Are Delays in Academic Publishing Necessary. The American Economic Review, 95, 407-413. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828608.

Morandi, V. (2013). The management of industry–university joint research projects: how do partners coordinate and control R&D activities?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38, 69-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-011-9228-5.

Nicolai, A., & Seidl, D. (2010). That’s Relevant! Different Forms of Practical Relevance in Management Science. Organization Studies, 31, 1257 - 1285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610374401.

PMI (Project Management Institute). (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute, Inc.

PMBOK. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute, Inc.

Poopan, S. (2016). “30 habilidades esenciales para el investigador cualitativo” Por John W. Creswell. Revista Internacional de Ciencias del Comportamiento, 22, 159-168.

Reichelt, K., & Lyneis, J. (1999). The dynamics of project performance: benchmarking the drivers of cost and schedule overrun. European Management Journal, 17, 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(98)00073-5.

Santos, J. M. R. C. A. (2021). Management of public–private R&D projects in Higher Education: key trends and issues. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 25(3), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2021.1894616

Tariq, S., Ahmad, N., Ashraf, M., Alghamdi, A., & Alfakeeh, A. (2020). Measuring the Impact of Scope Changes on Project Plan Using EVM. IEEE Access, 8, 154589-154613. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3018169.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-14

How to Cite

Challenges in the management of reseach projects with funding from Minciencias: case study Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas. (2024). Aglala, 15(2), 1-16. https://revistas.uninunez.edu.co/aglala/article/view/2470