Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023): AGLALA JOURNAL
Papers

Importance of the evaluation of lactobacillus plantarum atcc 8041® microencapsulate for the agroindustrial sector

pdf (Español (España))
  • Jhon Fredy Ceron Cordoba,
  • Juan Carlos Bolaños Bolaños,
  • Henry Jurado Gámez
Jhon Fredy Ceron Cordoba
Grupo de Investigación PROBIOTEC-FORAPIS
Juan Carlos Bolaños Bolaños
Grupo de Investigación PROBIOTEC-FORAPIS
Henry Jurado Gámez
Grupo de Investigación PROBIOTEC-FORAPIS

Published 2023-12-15

Keywords

  • ETA, LAB, Lactobacillus plantarum, Prebiotics, Probiotics, Campylobacter jejuni.

How to Cite

Ceron Cordoba, J. F., Bolaños Bolaños, J. C., & Jurado Gámez , H. (2023). Importance of the evaluation of lactobacillus plantarum atcc 8041® microencapsulate for the agroindustrial sector. Aglala, 14(2), 246–261. Retrieved from https://revistas.uninunez.edu.co/index.php/aglala/article/view/2405
Copyright Notice

Abstract

The inhibitory effect of microencapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum and its viability under simulated gastrointestinal conditions were evaluated. Reconstitution, sowing and adjustment of the inoculum were carried out; antibiogram; fermentation kinetics; determination of peptides, amino acids and lactic acid in the supernatant; resistance to temperatures of 37 and 45°C; micro-encapsulation; study at simulated gastrointestinal conditions of the microencapsulate after 90 days of storage; and production of exopolysaccharides (EPS). The results indicate inhibitory action of the L. plantarum strain against the pathogenic bacteria; exponential phase at 15 hours (MRS culture medium) and at 18 hours (PRO culture medium), with the kinetic parameters in the exponential phase as follows: protein production 2.43mg/L (MRS) and 4, 86mg/L (PRO); sugar consumption 4.96 mg/L (MRS) and 7.68 mg/L (PRO); acidity percentage 1.32% (MRS) and 1.75% (PRO); pH 4.07 (MRS) and 3.86 (PRO); results of the study and analysis of the microencapsulation: 100% viability; efficiency 84.64%; humidity 4.0%; solubility 99.8%; wettability 2 min 22 seconds; water activity 0.617 and particle size between 2.10µm and 5.28µm. It was concluded that microencapsulated L. plantarum presented inhibitory properties against the pathogenic strain and has in vitro adherence.

pdf (Español (España))

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Acosta Nieves, I., Roenes, G. (2019). Staphylococcus aureus procedentes de quesos costeños de Valledupar; susceptibilidad a antibióticos y perfil plasmídico. Rev Méd Risaralda 25(1):10–4. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0122-06672019000100010
  2. Alizadeh Behbahani, B., Noshad, M., Falah, F. (2019). Inhibition of Escherichia coli adhesion to human intestinal Caco-2 cells by probiotic candidate Lactobacillus plantarum strain L15. Microb Pathog 136(3): 123-134. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103677
  3. Andrade, J., Alexandre, M., Da Silva, C., De Sousa Campos, R., Aires do Nascimento, FBS., Serpa Sampaio. (2019). A mechanistic approach to the in-vitro resistance modulating effects of fluoxetine against meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Microb Pathog 127(November 2018):335–40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.11.056
  4. Bauer, A., Kirby, W., Sherris, C., Turck, M. (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 45(4):493–6.
  5. Brodkorb A, Egger L, Alminger M, Alvito P, Assunção R, Ballance S. (2019). INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion. Nat Protoc.14(4): 991–1014. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41596-018-0119-1
  6. Cai Y, Puangpen S, Premsuda S, Benno Y. (1999). Classification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestines of common carp and freshwater prawns. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45(4):177–84. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12501375/
  7. Ceron-Cordoba JF, Jurado-Gámez H, Bolaños-Bolaños JC. (2021). Aplicación de un probiótico (lactobacillus reuteri atcc 53608) microencapsulado en una bebida tipo sorbete a base de pulpa de fruta (banano y mango) como alimento funcional y su aplicación en la industria alimentaria. AGLALA. 12(2):249–63.
  8. Chen L, Song Z, Tan SY, Zhang H, Yuk H-G. (2020). Application of Bacteriocins Produced from Lactic Acid Bacteria for Microbiological Food Safety. Curr Top Lact Acid Bact Probiotics 6(1):1–8. Available from: http://www.elabp.org/archive/view_article?pid=labp-6-1-1
  9. Chen, W. (2019). LacticAcid Bacteria and Fermented Meat Products. Lactic Acid Bacteria Bioengieering and Industrial Applications. Singapore: Springer; 211–226 p.
  10. Cramer A, Rogers E, Parker J, Lukes R. (1972). The use of Giemsa stain for tissue sections. Med Bull. 59(6):148–56.
  11. Cruz Pacheco K, Madrigal Mendoza GA, Valencia G, Páramo Durán E. (2009). Viabilidad de Lactobacillus delbrueckii libre e inmovilizado bajo condiciones gastrointestinales simuladas in vitro. Lactobacillus 4(2)1–22.
  12. Cruz Ramos R. (2015). Estudio de la supervivencia de bacterias probióticas microencapsuladas bajo condiciones gastrointestinales simuladas en un sistema dinámico. Instituto Tecnológico de Tuxtla Gutiérrez. Available from:
  13. http://repositorio.digital.tuxtla.tecnm.mx:8080//xmlui/handle/123456789/1004
  14. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. (2010). Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances. Anal Chem, 28(3):350–6. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ac60111a017
  15. El-Enshasy, H., Yang, S. (2021). Probiotics, the Natural Microbiota in Living Organisms. 1st ed. Probiotics, the Natural Microbiota in Living Organisms. CRC Press.
  16. Erginkaya Z, Turhan EU, Tatli D. (2018). Determination of antibiotic resistance of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional Turkish fermented dairy products. Iran J Vet Res. 19(1):56. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5960774/
  17. Fajardo-Argoti C, Jurado-Gámez H, Parra-Suescún J. (2021). Viabilidad de Lactobacillus plantarum microencapsulado bajo condiciones gastrointestinales simuladas e inhibición sobre Escherichia coli O157:H7 Viability of microencapsulated Lactobacillus plantarum under simulated
  18. gastrointestinal conditions and inhibit. Rev UDCA Actual Divulg Científica 24 (1): 1-12. Available from: http://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v24.n1.2021.1733
  19. Fang Wu Wu JW. (2020). Caracterización de bacterias ácido lácticas (bal) aisladas de ensilados de piña como microorganismos con potencial probiótico y determinación de su aplicabilidad como cultivo bioprotector en leche agria. Ciudad Unversitaria Rodrigo Facio, Costa Rica;
  20. Flores Tixicuro JM. (2020). Optimización estadística de la producción de ácido láctico a partir de lactosuero por Lactobacillus casei . Universidad Técnica del]. Available from: http://repositorio.utn.edu.ec/handle/123456789/11169
  21. Flórez AB, Mayo B. (2017). Antibiotic resistance-susceptibility profiles of Streptococcus thermophilus isolated from raw milk and genome analysis of the genetic basis of acquired resistances. Front Microbiol. 22(8):1–12.
  22. Fonseca, H., De Sousa, D., Ramos, C., Dias, D., Schwan, R. (2021). Probiotic Properties of Lactobacilli and Their Ability to Inhibit the Adhesion of Enteropathogenic Bacteria to Caco-2 and HT-29 Cells. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 13(1):102–12.
  23. Gao L, Zhu H, Chen Y, Yang Y. (2021). Antibacterial pathway of cefquinome against Staphylococcus aureus based on label-free quantitative proteomics analysis. J Microbiol 59(12):1112–24. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12275-021-1201-x
  24. González BA, Domínguez-Espinosa R, Alcocer BR. (2007). Use of Aloe vera juice as substrate for growth of Lactobacillus plantarum and L. casei. Cienc y Tecnol Aliment. 6(2):152–7. Available from: www.somenta.org/journal
  25. González, E., Gómez-Caravaca, A., Giménez, B., Cebrián, R., Maqueda, M., Parada, J. (2020). Role of maltodextrin and inulin as encapsulating agents on the protection of oleuropein during in vitro gastrointestinal digestion. Food Chem. Apr 25;310:125976.
  26. Guimarães DP, Costa FAA, Rodrigues MI, Maugeri F. (1999). Optimization of dextran syntesis and acidic hydrolisis by surface response analysis. Journal of Animal, 16(2):129–39.
  27. Guo H, Pan L, Li L, Lu J, Kwok L, Menghe B. (2017). Characterization of Antibiotic Resistance Genes from Lactobacillus Isolated from Traditional Dairy Products. J Food Sci 82(3):724–30. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28182844/
  28. Gúzman-Insuasty M, Jarrín-Jarrín V, Jurado-Gámez H. (2015). Determinación De La Cinética, Pruebas De Crecimiento Microbiano y Efecto de Inhibición In Vitro de Lactobacillus lactis en Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus agalactiae y Escherichia coli. Rev la Fac Med Vet y Zootec, 62(2):40–56. Available from: http://www.revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/remevez/article/view/51993
  29. Hutkins, R. (2019). Microbiology and Technology of Fermented Food. Wiley Blac. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 618 p.
  30. James M, Velastegui E, Cruz MA. (2017). Evaluation of culture conditions of Lactobacillus acidophilus y Lactobacillus casei on laboratory scale, with inulin as carbon source. Bionatura, 2(1):235–40. Available from: http://revistabionatura.com/2017.02.01.4.html
  31. Jurado-Gámez H, Gúzman-Insuasty M, Jarrín-Jarrín V. (2015). Determinación de la cinética, pruebas de crecimiento y efecto de inhibición in vitro de Lactobacillus lactis en Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus agalactiae y Escherichia coli. Rev la Fac Med Vet y Zootec, 62(2):40–56. Available from: https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/remevez/article/view/51993
  32. Jurado-Gámez H, Martínez-Benavides J, Morillo-Garcés JA, Orbes-Villacorte AE, Mesías-Pantoja LN. (2016). Cinética de fermentación, pruebas de desafío in vitro y efecto de inhibición de Lactobacillus gasseri ATCC 19992. Vet y Zootecnía,10(2):72–89. Available from: http://vip.ucaldas.edu.co/vetzootec/downloads/v10n2a07.pdf
  33. Jurado-Gámez, H., Calpa-Yama, F., Chaspuengal-Tulcán, A. (2014). Determinación in vitro de la acción probiótica de Lactobacillus plantarum sobre Yersinia pseudotuberculosis aislada de Cavia porcellus. Rev la Fac Med Vet y Zootec. 61(3):241–57. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-29522014000300004&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
  34. Jurado-Gámez, H., Ramírez, C., Aguirre, D. (2013). Cinética de fermentación de Lactobacillus plantarum en un medio de cultivo enriquecido como potencial probiótico. Vet y Zootecnía. 7(2):37–53.
  35. Kanauchi M. (2019). Lactic Acid Bacteria: Methods and Protocols. Springer.
  36. Khamis, M., Mousa, M., Helmy, N. (2021). Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in some meat products. Alexandria J Vet Sci. 70(1):96–105. Available from: www.alexjvs.com
  37. Koohestani, M., Moradi, M., Tajik, H., Badali, A. (2018). Effects of cell-free supernatant of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA5 and Lactobacillus casei 431 against planktonic form and biofilm of Staphylococcus aureus. Veterinary research forum, 9(4): 301–306. https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2018.33086
  38. Korcz E, Varga L. (2021). Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: Techno-functional application in the food industry. Vol. 110, Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021. p. 375–84.
  39. Kunová G, Rada V, Lisová I, Ročková Š, Vlková E. (2011). In vitro Fermentability of Prebiotic Oligosaccharides by Lactobacilli. Czech J Food Sci. 29:49–54.
  40. Long, J., Du, G., Chen, J., Xie, C., Xu, J., Yuan, J. (2023). Bacteria and poisonous plants/fungi were the primary causative hazards of foodborne disease
  41. outbreaks: A five-year survey from Guangzhou, Guangdong. Int J Food Microbiol. 400(September 2022).
  42. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. Nov;193(1):265–75.
  43. May-Torruco LA, Corona-Cruz AI, Luna-Jiménez AL, González-Cortés N, Jiménez-Vera R. (2020). Sensibilidad y Resistencia a Antibióticos de Cepas Probióticas Empleadas en Productos Comerciales. Eur Sci J. Jun;16(18):43–60.
  44. Mendonca, A., Thomas-Popo, E., Gordon, A. (2020). Microbiological considerations in food safety and quality systems implementation. In: Food Safety and Quality Systems in Developing Countries. Academic P. London: Charlotte Cockle. p. 185–260.
  45. Montes Ramírez LM. (2013). Efecto de la microencapsulación con agentes prebióticos sobre la viabilidad de microorganismos probióticos (Lactobacillus
  46. } casei ATCC 393 y Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 9469) [Internet]. Bogotá. p. 106. Available from: https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/11893
  47. Mora-Villalobos JA, Montero-Zamora J, Barboza N, Rojas-Garbanzo C, Usaga J, Redondo-Solano M, et al. (2020). Multi-Product Lactic Acid Bacteria Fermentations: A Review. Fermentation [Internet]. 6(23):21. Available from: https://www.ftb.com.hr/80-volume-44-issue-no-2/445-biotechnological-production-of-lactic-acid-
  48. Munera Cabal, G. (2020). Encapsulación de antimicrobianos naturales en sistemas nano y microestructurados: técnicas y aplicaciones en tecnología de alimentos [Internet]. [Valencia - España]: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; [cited 2021 Dec 8]. Available from:
  49. https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/148962/Munera - Encapsulación de antimicrobianos naturales en sistemas nano y microestructurados: técnic....pdf?sequence=2
  50. Osorio, M., Rizo-Tello, V., Sánchez, E., Prieto-Alvarado, F., Gómez, L. (2021) Brote de enfermedad transmitida por alimentos en una poblacion especal. Cali, Colombia 2021. Interdiscip J Epidimiologyology Public Heal. 4(2):1–8.
  51. Paim DRSF, Costa SDO, Walter EHM, Tonon R V. (2016). Microencapsulation of probiotic jussara (Euterpe edulis M.) juice by spray drying. Lwt [Internet]. 74:21–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.07.022
  52. Rajkovic A, Smigic N, Devlieghere F. (2010). Contemporary strategies in combating microbial contamination in food chain. Int J Food Microbiol [Internet]. 141 Suppl (SUPPL.). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20056287/
  53. Rodrigues, F., Cedran, M., Bicas, J., Sato, H. (2019). Encapsulated probiotic cells: Relevant techniques, natural sources as encapsulating materials and food applications – A narrative review. Food Res Int, 37:109682. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109682
  54. Rodríguez Barona S, Giraldo GI, Montes LM. (2016). Encapsulación de Alimentos Probióticos mediante Liofilización en Presencia de Prebioticos. Inf tecnológica [Internet]. 27(6):135–44. Available from: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-07642016000600014&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
  55. Roldán Pérez, S., Gómez Rodríguez, S., Sepúlveda, J., Simón Ruiz, O., Márquez Fernández, M., Montoya Campuzano, O. (2023). Assessment of probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from an artisanal Colombian cheese. Build Environ. 23(27): 3-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107386
  56. Romero-Benavides DA, Morillo-Garces JA, Jurado-Gámez HA. (2016). Inhibición de Lactobacillus gasseri sobre Yersinia pseudotuberculosis bajo condiciones in vitro. Rev la Fac Med Vet y Zootec [Internet]. 63(2):95–112. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-29522016000200003&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es
  57. Rosales-Bravo H, Vázquez-Martínezb J, Morales-Torres HC, Olalde-Portuga V. (2020). Evaluación de propiedades tecno-funcionales de cepas probióticas comerciales del género Lactobacillus. RIIIT Rev Int Investig e innovación tecnológica [Internet]. 8(45). Available from: https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-97532020000400001
  58. Salazar Salazar, Z., Hurtado Ayala, L. (2017). Pruebas de susceptibilidad a bacteriocinas producidas por BAL en bacterias resistentes a antibióticos. Rev Mex Ciencias Farm 48(1):7–17. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57956614002
  59. Sánchez F E, Nuñez R D, Cruz L R, Torres M, Herrera E. (2017). Simulación y Conteo de Unidades Formadoras de Colonias. Rev electrónica Comput Informática, Biomédica y Electrónica. 6(1):97–111. Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=512253717006
  60. Sánchez L, Omura M, Lucas A, Pérez T, Ferreira C de L. (2015). Cepas de Lactobacillus spp. con capacidades probióticas aisladas del tracto intestinal de terneros neonatos. Rev Salud Anim. 37(2):94–104. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rsa/v37n2/rsa04215.pdf
  61. Schulte RH, Munson E. (2019). Staphylococcus aureus Resistance Patterns in Wisconsin: 2018 Surveillance of Wisconsin Organisms for Trends in Antimicrobial Resistance and Epidemiology (SWOTARE) Program Report. Clin Med Res [Internet]. 17(3–4):72–81. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31582419/
  62. Serna Jimenez AJ. (2012). Elaboración De Jugos De Fruta Con Adición De Bacterias Ácido Lácticas Con Potencial Probiótico [Internet]. Universidad de la Sabana. Available from: intellectum.unisabana.edu.co:8080/jspui/bitstream/10818/3633/1/Johanna Serna Jimenez_157728.pdf
  63. Sinsajoa-Tepud M, Jurado-Gamez H, Narváez-Rodríguez M. (2019). Evaluación de Lactobacillus plantarum microencapsulado y su viabilidad bajo condiciones gastrointestinales simuladas e inhibición frente a Escherichia coli O157:H7. Rev la Fac Med Vet y Zootec. 66(3):231–44.
  64. Stewart, G. (2017). Chapter 18 - Staphylococcal Food Poisoning. Foodborne Dis. 367–80. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385007-2.00018-8
  65. Sultana M, Chan ES, Janarthanan P, Choo WS. (2023). Functional orange juice with Lactobacillus casei and tocotrienol-enriched flaxseed oil co-encapsulation: Physicochemical properties, probiotic viability, oxidative stability, and sensorial acceptability. Available from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643823009672
  66. Tagg, J., McGiven, A. (1971). Assay System for Bacteriocins. Appl Microbiol;21(5):943–943. Available from: https://journals.asm.org/journal/am
  67. Taylor, M., Zhu, M. (2021). Control of Listeria monocytogenes in low-moisture foods. Trends Food Sci Technol. Oct 1;116:802–14.
  68. Torres, G., Vargas, K., Reyes-Vélez, J., Jiménez, N., Blanchard, A., Olivera-Angel, M. (2023). High genetic diversity and zoonotic potential of Staphylococcus aureus strains recovered from bovine intramammary infections in Colombians dairy herds. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 93(52) 3-34
  69. Torres, G., Vargas, K., Sánchez-Jiménez, M., Reyes-Velez, J., Olivera-Angel, M. (2019). Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of biofilm production by Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine intramammary infections in Colombian dairy farms. Heliyon. 5(10): 34-45.
  70. Vallejo M, Ledesma P, Anselmino L, Marguet E. (2014). Efecto de las condiciones de crecimiento y composición del medio de cultivo sobre la producción de bacteriocina de Enterococcus mundtii Tw56 Effect of growth conditions and culture medium composition on bacteriocin production by Enterococcus mundtii Tw56. Vol. 16, Rev. Colomb. Biotecnol.
  71. Vera Mejía R, Sánchez Miranda L, Zambrano Gavilares P, Rodriguez Perdomo Y. (2021). Obtención de un candidato a probiótico de Lactobacillus plantarum 22 LMC a partir de un medio de cultivo natural con materias primas agroindustriales. Rev Salud Anim [Internet], 43(3):1–6. Available from: http://revistas.censa.edu.cu/index.php/RSA/article/view/1176
  72. Zheng, Y., Gracia, A., Hu, L. (2023). Predicting Foodborne Disease Outbreaks with Food Safety Certifications: Econometric and Machine Learning Analyses. Journal Food Protein [Internet]. 86(9):100136. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100136