Change management of higher education institutions against Covid-19
Keywords:
Higher education institutions, change management, strategy, COVID-19Abstract
The objective of this study is to analyze the change management and strategies implemented by HEIs in the face of the pandemic caused by Covid-19. The nature of the quantitative methodology implies the implementation of methods for measuring reality in order to generalize results. As a result, the variable that showed the greatest similarity was knowledge, which encompasses the competencies and technical skills present in its human resources, in the same way this variable considers the knowledge assets of the organizations. It can be observed that the efforts made by the HEIs are focused on learning processes based on technical and technological capabilities and skills; however, this knowledge variable alone requires other elements such as culture, structure and strategic focus in order to guarantee optimal change management.
References
Arias, F. G. (2012). El proyecto de investigación. Introducción a la metodología científica. 6ta. Fidias G. Arias Odón.
Carnall, C. A. (2007). Managing change in organizations. Pearson Education.
Cho, J. Y., Lee, D. Y., Lee, Y. J., & Lee, M. J. (2015). Effective change management process for mega program projects. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 14(1), 81-88.
Daft, R. L. (2011). Teoría y diseño organizacional (10.ª ed.). México: Cengage.
Fernández, R. S. M. (2011). Análisis de correspondencias simples y múltiples. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid: Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales.
González, J. A., Alonso, P. B., & Gallego, A. G. (2008). Análisis de correspondencias y estudio de historias de vida: una aplicación a la encuesta de transición educativo-formativa e inserción laboral. Pecvnia: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de León, (6), 1-27.
Greiner, L. E. (1998). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard business review, 76(3), 55-64.
Hiatt, J. (2006). ADKAR: a model for change in business, government, and our community. Prosci Research. ISBN: 978-1930885509
Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2009). Fundamentals of strategy. Pearson Education.
Kang, D., & Evans, J. (2020). Against method: Exploding the boundary between qualitative and quantitative studies of science. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 930-944.
Kotter, J. P. (1980). An integrative model of organizational dynamics. Organizational assessment: Perspectives on the measurement of organizational behavior and the quality of working life. New York: Wiley.
Kotter, J. P., Collins, J. C., Duck, J. D., Goss, T., & Pascale, R. (2001). Gestión del cambio (No. 658.406 G393g). Bilbao, ES: Ed. Deusto.
Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van der Voet, J. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public administration, 92(1), 1-20.
Martín González, R. (2016). Aplicación del modelo adkar al estudio organizativo: caso del mercado de Nuestra Señora de África.
Martínez-Bustos, E., Carrasco-Sagredo, C., & Bull, M. T. (2018). Propuesta metodológica para implementar la primera fase del modelo de gestión del cambio organizacional de Lewin. Estudios Gerenciales, 34(146), 88-98.
McNeill, M. A., Arthur, L. S., Breyer, Y. A., Huber, E., & Parker, A. J. (2012). Theory into practice: Designing Moodle training for change management.
Mengíbar, M., del Río, S. y Terol, J. (2007). La gestión del cambio. En Temes J.L. y Mengíbar M. (Eds.), Gestión Hospitalaria (pp. 501- 518), Madrid: McGraw Hill Interamericana.
Miguélez, M. M. (2018). El proceso de nuestro conocer postula un nuevo paradigma epistémico. Polis Revista Latinoamericana, (8).
Robbins, S., & Coulter, M. (2009). Foundations of planning. Management.
Rodríguez, G. B., & Fernández, M. D. (2007). Gestión del cambio organizacional a través de proyectos. Ingeniería Industrial, 28 (1), 42-47.
Sartori, G. (1994). La comparación en las ciencias sociales (pp. 29-50). Madrid: Alianza.
Schick-Makaroff, K., MacDonald, M., Plummer, M., Burgess, J., & Neander, W. (2016). What synthesis methodology should I use? A review and analysis of approaches to research synthesis. AIMS Public Health, 3(1), 172.
Tamayo, M. (2004). El proceso de la investigación científica. Editorial Limusa.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors give their rights to the article in a non-exclusive way for the magazine to be published for the first time by the journal as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, to an institutional repository or to publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or your own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as a citation more early and most of published work (See the Effect of Open Access) (in English).
