Virtual learning environments as pedagogical mediation strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22519/22157360.1443Keywords:
Education, pedagogy, teaching, learningAbstract
A review of the available literature associated with virtual learning environments as a pedagogical mediation strategy was carried out, which have useful teaching tools that facilitate the understanding and development of the student's technological and cognitive skills. The research was of a qualitative type because it was analyzed and described the impact that virtual learning environments (VLE) have on the pedagogical mediation of teachers in their classes, so the documentary review was used as a means for the collection of scientific information. This allowed us to establish that the application of VLE in pedagogical mediation facilitates intercommunication between teachers and students in the realization of the teaching-learning processes, as well as positively affecting the motivation and performance of the students.
References
Altinay, F. y Altinay, Z. (2015). Examination on ICT integration into Special Education Schools for Developing Countries. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 70-72.
Alves, P., Miranda, L. y Morais, C. (2017). The Influence of Virtual Learning Environments in Students’ Performance. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 517-527.
Anyan, F. (2013). The Influence of Power Shifts in Data Collection and Analysis Stages: A Focus on Qualitative Research Interview. The Qualitative Report, 18(36), 1-9.
Choeda, Penjor, T., Dupka, D. y Zander, P. (2016). The State of Integration of the Virtual Learning Environment and ICT into the Pedagogy of the Royal University of Bhutan: A Descriptive Study. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 12(1), 71-88.
Cimadomo, G. (2014). Teaching History of Architecture - Moving From A Knowledge Transfer to A Multi-Participative Methodology Based On It Tools. Journal of Learning Design. 7(3), 79-90.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Eyles, A.M. (2018). Teachers’ Perspectives about Implementing ICT in Music Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 110-131.
Filcher, C., y Miller, G. (2000). Learning strategies for distance education students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 41(1), 60-68. doi:10.5032/jae.2000.01060.
Fowler, C. (2014). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412–422.
Hepp, K. P., Hinostroza, S.E., Laval, M.E., Rehbein, L. F. (2004) "Technology in Schools”: Education, ICT and the Knowledge Society "OECD.
Ihmeideh, F. y Al-Maadadi, F. (2018). Towards Improving Kindergarten Teachers’ Practices Regarding the Integration of ICT into Early Years Settings. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 27(1), 65–78.
Jhurree, V. (2005). "Technology Integration in Education in Developing Countries: Guidelines to Policy Makers”. International Education Journal [Electronic], 6(4):467-483.
Kiru, E. (2018). Mathematics Teachers’ Use of Information and Communication Technologies: An International Comparison. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 165-177.
Leese, M. (2009). Out of class—out of mind? The use of a virtual learning environment to encourage student engagement in out of class activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 70–77
Hederich, C. (2010). Efecto de un andamiaje para facilitar el aprendizaje autorregulado en ambientes hipermedia. Revista Colombiana de Educación, 58, 14-39.
Ofsted (2009). Virtual learning environments: an evaluation of their development in a sample of educational settings (ref: 070251). London: Ofsted.
Peterson-Ahmad, M.B., Pemberton, J. y Hovey, K.A. (2018). Virtual
Learning Environments for Teacher Preparation, Kappa Delta Pi Record, 54(4), 165-169
Quevedo, A. (2011). O ensino semipresencial, do ponto de vista do aluno. Revista Científica e-curriculum, 7(1), 1-21.
Reisoğlu, I., Topu, B., Topu, R., Karakuş, T. y Göktaş, Y. (2016). 3D virtual learning environments in education: a meta-review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 18(1), 81-100.
Rué, J. (2009). Aprendizaje autónomo en la Educación superior. Madrid (España), Narcea Ediciones.
UNESCO (2002). Aprendizaje Abierto y a distancia: consideraciones sobre tendencias, políticas y estrategias [en línea]. Montevideo (Uruguay): Trilce. 111 p. ISBN 9974-32-348-7 Recuperado de http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001284/128463s.pdf>
Vanderlinde, R., Aesaert K. y van Braak, J. (2015). Measuring ICT use and contributing conditions in primary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1056–1063.
Weller, M. (2007) Virtual learning environments: using, choosing and developing your VLE.Abingdon: Routledge.
Yusuf, M.O. (2005). Information and communication education: Analyzing the Nigerian national policy for information technology. International Education Journal, Vol. 6 No. (3), Pp: 316-321.
Zhu, X., Sun, B. y Luo, Y. (2017). Interactive learning system “VisMis” for scientific visualization course. Interactive Learning Environments.1-13a
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors give their rights to the article in a non-exclusive way for the magazine to be published for the first time by the journal as well as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of work and initial publication in this magazine.
b. Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the journal (for example, to an institutional repository or to publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed and encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (e.g., in institutional repositories or your own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as a citation more early and most of published work (See the Effect of Open Access) (in English).
