Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2022): REVISTA AGLALA
Artículos Cientificos

Personalidad emprendedora y su relación con la innovación en micro y pequeñas empresas en el contexto fronterizo Ecuador-Colombia

PDF
  • Luis Viveros Almeida,
  • Verónica Janeth García Ibarra,
  • Claudia Magali Solarte Solarte,
  • Gloria Alicia Rivera Vallejo
Luis Viveros Almeida
Universidad Politécnica Estatal del Carchi
Verónica Janeth García Ibarra
Universidad Agraria del Ecuador
Claudia Magali Solarte Solarte
Universidad Cesmag
Gloria Alicia Rivera Vallejo
Universidad Cesmag

Publicado 2022-12-15

Palabras clave

  • personalidad,
  • emprender,
  • innovación,
  • contexto fronterizo,
  • Ecuador,
  • Colombia
    • ...Más
    Menos

Cómo citar

Viveros Almeida, L., García Ibarra, V. J., Solarte Solarte, C. M., & Rivera Vallejo, G. A. (2022). Personalidad emprendedora y su relación con la innovación en micro y pequeñas empresas en el contexto fronterizo Ecuador-Colombia. Aglala, 13(2), 271–284. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.uninunez.edu.co/index.php/aglala/article/view/2264
Aviso de derechos de autor/a

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio es determinar la relación entre la personalidad del emprendedor (estabilidad emocional, simpatía, conciencia, apertura a la experiencia, extraversión) y la innovación empresarial. Se basa en la teoría de los niveles superiores. Por lo tanto, se recolectaron 413 encuestas a 219 empresarios ecuatorianos y 194 empresarios colombianos de micro y pequeñas empresas en el contexto fronterizo de Ecuador y Colombia, específicamente en la Provincia del Carchi y el Departamento de Nariño en tiempos de pandemia. Los datos recolectados fueron procesados en SPSS mediante el uso de regresiones jerárquicas. Los principales hallazgos permitieron determinar que existe una relación positiva y significativa entre los siguientes rasgos de personalidad del emprendedor ecuatoriano: estabilidad emocional, apertura a la experiencia y conciencia de innovación (β = 0.31, p<0.001; β = 0.36, p<. 0.001 ; β = 0,24, p<0,001). En el caso del emprendedor colombiano se encontró una relación negativa y no significativa en los rasgos de estabilidad emocional con la innovación (β = -0,10). Por otro lado, la relación de los emprendedores colombianos con rasgos de personalidad consciente con la innovación fue positiva y no significativa (β = 0,10).

PDF

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Aiken, LS, & West, SG (1996). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  2. Amabile, T. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. In BM Staw & LL Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123-167). Greenwich: JHA Press.
  3. Benischke, M., Martin, G., & Glaser, L. (2018). CEO equity risk bearing and strategic risk taking: The moderating effect of CEO personality. Strategic Management Journal, 40(1), 153-177. https://doi:10.1002/smj.2974
  4. Blumentritt, TP, Keyt, AD, & Astrachan, JH. (2007). Creating an Environment for Successful Nonfamily CEOs: An Exploratory Study of Good Principals. Family Business Review, 20(4), 321–335. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6248.2007. 00102.x
  5. Bucciol, A., & Zarri, L. (2017). Do personality traits influence investors' portfolios? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 68, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.03.001
  6. Caliendo, M., Goethner, M., & Weißenberger, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial persistence beyond survival: Measurement and determinants. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(3), 617–647. doi:10.1080/00472778.2019.1666532
  7. Caliendo, M; Goethner, M; Weißenberger, Y. M. (2020). Entrepreneurial persistence beyond survival: measurement and determinants, 1-24.
  8. Chamber of Fair Trade. (2020). Economic Impact Survey of Covid - 19 [PDF File]. https://www.ccpasto.org.co/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Impacto-del-Covid-19-en-las-Empresas-en-el-Departamento-de-Nari%C3%B1o. -October.pdf
  9. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, SG, & Aiken, LS. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science (3rd ed), Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
  10. Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO FFI): Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9
  11. Dwivedi, A., & Weerawardena, J. (2018). Conceptualizing and operationalizing the social entrepreneurship construct. Journal of Business Research, 86, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.053
  12. Garcés-Galdeano, L., Larraza-Kintana, M., Cruz, C., & Contín-Pilart, I. (2017). Just about money? CEO satisfaction and firm performance in small family firms. Small Business Economics, 49(4), 825–839. https://doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9863-9
  13. Goel, N., Basner, M., Rao, H., & Dinges, DF (2013). Circadian Rhythms, Sleep Deprivation, and Human Performance. Chronobiology: Biological Timing in Health and Disease, 155–190. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396971-2.00007-5 (4)
  14. Gupta, A., Nadkarni, S., & Mariam, M. (2018). Dispositional Sources of Managerial Discretion: CEO Ideology, CEO Personality, and Firm Strategies. Journal of Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(4), 855-893. https://doi: 10.1177/0001839218793128
  15. Hao Zhao, Seibert, SE, & Lumpkin, GT. (2009). The Relationship of Personality to Entrepreneurial Intentions and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381–404. doi:10.1177/0149206309335187
  16. Hambrick, D.C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334-343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
  17. Hambrick, DC, & Mason, PA (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277628
  18. Harrison, J., Thurgood, G., Boivie, S., Pfarrer, M. (2019). Measuring CEO personality: Developing, validating, and testing a linguistic tool. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1-15. https://doi:10.1002/smj.3023
  19. Hauswald, H., & Hack, A, (2013). Impact of Family Control/Influence on Stakeholders' Perceptions of Benevolence. Family Business Review, 26(4), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486513477453
  20. Herrmann, P., & Nadkarni, S. (2013). Managing Strategic Change: The Duality of CEO Personality. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1318–1342. https://doi:10.1002/smj.2156
  21. Herrmann, P & Nadkarni, S. (2014).' Managing strategic change: The duality of CEO personality'. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1318-1342.https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2156
  22. Jahanshahi, A., Brem, A., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2017). Who Takes More Sustainability-Oriented Entrepreneurial Actions? The Role of Entrepreneurs' Values, Beliefs and Orientations. Journal of Sustainability, 9(10), 1636. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su9101636
  23. Kelleci, R., Lambrechts, F., Voordeckers, W., & Huybrechts, J. (2019). CEO Personality: A Different Perspective on the Nonfamily Versus Family CEO Debate. Family Business Review, 32(1), 31–57. https://doi: 10.1177/0894486518811222
  24. Lizar, AA, Mangundjaya, WL, & Rachmawan, A. (2015). The Role of Psychological Capital and Psychological Empowerment on Individual Readiness for Change. The Journal of Developing Areas 49(5), 343-352. https://doi:10.1353/jda.2015.0063
  25. Lumpkin, GT, & Dess, GG (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. doi:10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  26. Neely, BH, Lovelace, JB, Cowen, AP, & Hiller, NJ. (2020). Metacritiques of Upper Echelons Theory: Verdicts and Recommendations for Future Research. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029-1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908640
  27. Obschonka,M and Stuetzer, M. (2017). Integrating psychological approaches to entrepreneurship: the Entrepreneurial Personality System (EPS). Econ 49 Small Bus, 203–231 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9821-y
  28. Prasad, B. and Junni, P. (2017). A contingency model of CEO characteristics and firm innovativeness: The moderating role of organizational size. Journal of Management Decision, 55(1), 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-02-2016-0071
  29. Pillemer, D.B. (1990). Clarifying flashbulb memory concept: Comment on McCloskey, Wible, and Cohen (1988). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.1.92
  30. Schepers, J., Voordeckers, W., Steijvers, T., Laveren, E. (2013). The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: the moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Journal of Small Business Economics, 43, 39-55, https://doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9533-5
  31. Soto, CJ, & John, OP. (2017). 'Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI-2-XS'. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
  32. Thompson, V. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative, Science Quarterly, 5(June), pp. 1-20.
  33. Nurseries, L. (2019). The dilemma of the border: effect of the exchange differential and strategies of the commercial sector of Tulcán. Sathiri: Sower,14(2), 108-125
  34. Woo, HR (2018). "Personality traits and intrapreneurship: the mediating effect of career adaptability", Career Development International, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 145-162. doi: 10.1108/CDI-02-2017-0046
  35. Vroom, VH (1964). Work and motivation. wiley.
  36. Ward, A., Hernández-Sánchez, BR, & Sánchez-García, JC. (2019). Entrepreneurial Potential and Gender Effects: The Role of Personality Traits in University Students' Entrepreneurial Intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02700
  37. Watts, RL., & Zimmerman, JL. (1978). towards a theory Positive Determination of Norms Accountants. The Accounting Review, 53, 112-134.
  38. Zisser, MR, Johnson, SL, Freeman, MA, & Staudenmaier, PJ. (2019). The relationship between entrepreneurial intent, gender and personality. Gender in Management, 34(8), 665-684. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-08-2018-0105