Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2022): Revista Aglala
Artículos Cientificos

Responsabilidad social e identificación organizacional: implicaciones para la gerencia de los recursos humanos

pdf
  • Orlando E. Contreras-Pacheco,
  • Leonardo H. Talero-Sarmiento,
  • Julio C. Camacho-Pinto
Orlando E. Contreras-Pacheco
Universidad Industrial de Santander
Leonardo H. Talero-Sarmiento
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga
Julio C. Camacho-Pinto
Universidad Industrial de Santander

Publicado 2022-06-30 — Actualizado el 2022-08-18

Versiones

Palabras clave

  • Corporate social responsability,
  • affective commitment,
  • employee-organizational identification,
  • managerial contributions

Cómo citar

Contreras-Pacheco, O. E., Talero-Sarmiento, L. H., & Camacho-Pinto, J. C. (2022). Responsabilidad social e identificación organizacional: implicaciones para la gerencia de los recursos humanos. Aglala, 13(1), 95–112. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.uninunez.edu.co/index.php/aglala/article/view/2083 (Original work published 30 de junio de 2022)
Aviso de derechos de autor/a

Resumen

Las iniciativas socialmente responsables son generadoras indiscutibles de un mayor nivel de sentido de pertenencia de los empleados como miembros de una organización. Este fenómeno, a su vez impulsa resultados favorables en los niveles individual, grupal, organizacional e incluso institucional. El presente trabajo reúne las implicaciones prácticas para la gerencia de los recursos humanos derivadas del vínculo causal indicado por estudios empíricos reportados en la literatura científica. Para ello, se parte de un proceso preliminar de análisis bibliométrico y tamizaje cualitativo manual, que selecciona las conclusiones de trabajos empíricos influyentes en la literatura relevante con respecto a la relación entre la responsabilidad social empresarial y la identificación organizacional de los empleados. Como consecuencia, el trabajo converge en un decálogo de prácticas útiles para gerentes y profesionales de recursos humanos que, en el terreno, pretende cultivar dicha relación. De esta manera, el trabajo permite el aprovechamiento de las contribuciones teóricas relevantes en el área de estudio particular, y lo pone a disposición de la práctica gerencial.

pdf

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

  1. Afsar, B., Cheema, S., & Javed, F. (2018). Activating employee’s pro-environmental behaviors: The role of CSR, organizational identification, and environmentally specific servant leadership. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1506
  2. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations, 32 Academy of Management Review § (2007). Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275678
  3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18.
  4. Banks, G. C., Pollack, J. M., Bochantin, J. E., Kirkman, B. L., Whelpley, C. E., & O’Boyle, E. H. (2016). Management’s Science-Practice Gap: A Grand Challenge for All Stakeholders. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 2205–2231. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0728
  5. Barnard, C. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  6. Bartel, C. A. (2001). Social Comparisons in Boundary-Spanning Work: Effects of Community Outreach on Members’ Organizational Identity and Identification Caroline. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(3), 379–413. https://doi.org/10.2307/3094869
  7. Bharadwaj, S., & Yameen, M. (2020). Analyzing the mediating effect of organizational identification on the relationship between CSR employer branding and employee retention. Management Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2020-0298
  8. Boudreau, J. W., & Ramstad, P. M. (2005). Talentship talent segmentation, and sustainability: A new HR decision science paradigm for a new strategy definition. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20054
  9. Brammer, S., He, H., & Mellahi, K. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility, Employee Organizational Identification, and Creative Effort: The Moderating Impact of Corporate Ability. Group & Organization Management, 40(3), 323–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114562246
  10. Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., & Waldman, D. A. (2007). The Role of Perceived Organizational Performance in Organizational Identification, Adjustment and Job Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00691.x
  11. Cepeda Susatama, K. D. ., Durango Ruíz, K. A. ., & Bohórquez Arévalo, L. E. (2017). Modelación y simulación basada en agentes como alternativa para el estudio de las organizaciones empresariales. Ingeniería Solidaria, 13(22), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.16925/in.v13i22.1838
  12. Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2015). Doing Well by Doing Good: The Benevolent Halo of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1412–1425. https://doi.org/10.1086/680089
  13. Cole, M. S., & Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their relationships to turnover intention: Does organizational hierarchy matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(5), 585–605.
  14. Contreras-Pacheco, O. E., Talero-Sarmiento, L. H., & Camacho-Pinto, J. C. (2019). Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Organizational Identification: Authenticity or Fallacy. Contaduría y Administración, 64(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2018.1631
  15. Cullen, J. B., Parboteeah, P., & Victor, B. (2003). The Effects of Ethical Climates on Organizational Commitment: A Two-Study Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 46(2), 127–141.
  16. De Roeck, K., & Delobbe, N. (2012). Do Environmental CSR Initiatives Serve Organizations’ Legitimacy in the Oil Industry? Exploring Employees’ Reactions Through Organizational Identification Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 110(4), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1489-x
  17. De Roeck, K., El Akremi, A., & Swaen, V. (2016). Consistency Matters! How and When Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect Employees’ Organizational Identification? Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1141–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12216
  18. Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106
  19. Farooq, O., Payaud, M., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment: Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1928-3
  20. Farooq, O., Rupp, D. E., & Farooq, M. (2017). The Multiple Pathways through which Internal and External Identification and Multifoci Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Cultural and Social Orientations. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 954–985. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0849
  21. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Series in Business and Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/research/strategic-management-a-stakeholder-approach-2/
  22. Geletkanycs, M., & Tepper, B. J. (2012). Publishing in AMJ-Part 6: Discussing the Implications. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 256–260. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.4002
  23. George, N. A., Aboobaker, N., & Edward, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, organizational trust and commitment: a moderated mediation model. Personnel Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2020-0144
  24. Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Psychology: An Integrative Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(144), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00144
  25. Glavas, A., & Godwin, L. N. (2013). Is the Perception of ‘Goodness’ Good Enough? Exploring the Relationship Between Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Organizational Identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1323-5
  26. Glavas, A., & Kelley, K. (2014). The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 165–202. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20143206
  27. Hameed, I., Riaz, Z., Arain, G. A., & Farooq, O. (2016). How Do Internal and External CSR Affect Employees’ Organizational Identification? A Perspective from the Group Engagement Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(May), Article 788. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00788
  28. He, H., & Brown, A. D. (2013). Organizational Identity and Organizational Identification: A Review of the Literature and Suggestions for Future Research. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112473815
  29. Jones, C., & Volpe, E. H. (2011). Organizational identification: Extending our understanding of social identities through social networks. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 413–434.
  30. Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 857–878. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X477495
  31. Jones, D. A., & Rupp, D. E. (2018). Social responsibility IN and OF organizations: the psychology of corporate social responsibility among organizational members. In D. S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, & H. K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology V3. (pp. 333–350). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  32. Keeble, B. R. (1988). The Brundtland report: ‘Our common future.’ Medicine and War, 4(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07488008808408783
  33. Kieser, A., Nicolai, A., & Seidl, D. (2015). The Practical Relevance of Management Research: Turning the Debate on Relevance into a Rigorous Scientific Research Program. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 143–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2015.1011853
  34. Kim, H., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0440-2
  35. Kim, J., Milliman, J., & Lucas, A. (2020). Effects of CSR on employee retention via identification and quality-of-work-life. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(3), 1163–1179. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2019-0573
  36. Lythreatis, S., Mostafa, A. M. S., Pereira, V., Wang, X., & Del Giudice, M. (2020). Servant leadership, CSR perceptions, moral meaningfulness and organizational identification- evidence from the Middle East. International Business Review, (November), 101772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101772
  37. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  38. Mahmood, F., Qadeer, F., Abbas, Z., Muhammadi, Hussain, I., Saleem, M., … Aman, J. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employees’ Negative Behaviors under Abusive Supervision: A Multilevel Insight. Sustainability, 12(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072647
  39. Markides, C. (2011). Crossing the Chasm: How to Convert Relevant Research Into Managerially Useful Research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(1), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886310388162
  40. McShane, L., & Cunningham, P. (2012). To Thine Own Self Be True? Employees’ Judgments of the Authenticity of Their Organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility Program. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1064-x
  41. Mozes, M., Josman, Z., & Yaniv, E. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, organizational identification and motivation. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111141558
  42. Newman, A., Miao, Q., Hofman, P. S., & Zhu, C. J. (2016). The impact of socially responsible human resource management on employees’ organizational citizenship behaviour: the mediating role of organizational identification. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(4), 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1042895
  43. Ñungo Pinzón, L. C., Torres González, B. & Palacios Osma, J. I. (2018). Modelo de nivel de madurez para los procesos de emprendimiento en las pymes colombianas. Ingeniería Solidaria, 14(26), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.16925/in.v14i26.2456
  44. Penrose, E. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  45. Pink, D. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
  46. Penrose, E. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  47. Pink, D. (2011). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Riverhead Books
  48. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600039410055963
  49. Riketta, M. (2005). Organizational identification: A meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 358–384.
  50. Rupp, D. E., & Mallory, D. B. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological, Person-Centric, and Progressing. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111505
  51. Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press., 1.
  52. Srinivasa, K. (2015). Beating the Odds! Build theory from emerging markets phenomenon and the emergence of case study research—A “Test-Tube” typology. Cogent: Business & Management, 2, 1037225. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1037225
  53. Srinivasa, K. (2015). Beating the Odds! Build theory from emerging markets phenomenon and the emergence of case study research—A “Test-Tube” typology. Cogent: Business & Management, 2, 1037225. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2015.1037225
  54. Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J., Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Grubba, C., … Tissington, P. A. (2004). Should I Stay or Should I Go? Explaining Turnover Intentions with Organizational Identification and Job Satisfaction*. British Journal of Management, 15(4), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00424.x
  55. Van Dick, R., Crawshaw, J. R., Karpf, S., Schuh, S. C., & Zhang, X. A. (2019). Identity, Importance, and Their Roles in How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Workplace Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-019-09619-w
  56. Van Gils, S., Hogg, M. A., Van Quaquebeke, N., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2017). When Organizational Identification Elicits Moral Decision- Making: A Matter of the Right Climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2784-0
  57. Victor, B., & Cullen, J. B. (1988). The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 101–125.
  58. Wan-Huggins, V. N., Riordan, C. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (1998). The development and longitudinal test of a model of organizational identification. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(8), 724–749.
  59. Wang, W., Fu, Y., Qiu, H., Moore, J. H., & Wang, Z. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(November), Article 1906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01906
  60. Wang, W., Fu, Y., Qiu, H., Moore, J. H., & Wang, Z. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8 (November), Article 1906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01906
  61. Zamora Carrillo, H., Novoa Torres, N., Bermúdez Huérfano, D. R. (2019). Nociones, consideraciones y ventajas de la inteligencia de negocios BI. Revista Vínculos, 16(2), 280–287. https://doi.org/10.14483/2322939X.15592